PMC Property Group, Inc. v. Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
PMC Property Group, Inc. v. Apogee Enterprises, Inc. was filed in the U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota on October 27, 2026, case no. 0:26-cv-04642, as a "Other Statutory Actions" case, according to the federal court record.
It is on CREdocket's Federal Lawsuit Watch because both sides are businesses or governments and a party's name indicates a commercial real estate owner, developer, hotel or property company (or it is a real property foreclosure or lease case between businesses). That is a reading of the caption only; the complaint on the docket says what the dispute is about.
Other CREdocket matters naming these parties: PMC Property Group, Inc. v. Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (New Minnesota Alter-Ego Suit Follows Dismissal From Philadelphia Glass-Defect Case)
Latest orders and rulings
- Oct 27, 2026Civil Cover Sheet No. 1
- Oct 27, 2026Exhibit(s) 4 - Riverwalk Tower II First Amendment and Warranties No. 1
- Oct 27, 2026Exhibit(s) 3 - Riverwalk Tower II Quote Confirmation No. 1
- Oct 27, 2026Exhibit(s) 2 - Riverwalk Tower I Quote Confirmation No. 1
- Oct 27, 2026Exhibit(s) 1 - Franklin Tower Warranties No. 1
- Oct 27, 2026COMPLAINT against Apogee Enterprises, Inc. No. 1
Orders, judgments, dismissals and closings from the docket via CourtListener, checked Oct 31, 2026. CREdocket checks each case daily for its first 30 days, and for as long as anyone follows it. Entries reach CourtListener with some delay, and not every entry does.
Email me when the court rules in this case
One email when an order, judgment, dismissal or closing appears on this docket. Free account; stop any time.
Facing a dispute like this one?
Get a damages range for your own facts, with the reasoning and the cases behind it.
Estimate your caseOther recent cases in the D. Minnesota
Recent on Federal Lawsuit Watch
From the federal court record via CourtListener and the RECAP Archive, a project of the nonprofit Free Law Project. CREdocket lists cases between businesses or governments only and adds nothing about the parties beyond the record. Not legal advice. Something wrong here? Tell us and we will correct it.