Transportation Consultants, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Louisiana Surplus Lines Arbitration Ruling)
The Fifth Circuit held that an arbitration clause in a surplus lines commercial property policy covering Hurricane Ida damage in Louisiana is unenforceable against the nine domestic insurers subscribing to the policy, even though the same clause remains enforceable against the two foreign Lloyd's of London underwriters on the identical contract. The court, following its own precedents in Town of Vinton v. Indian Harbor Insurance Co. and Crescent City Surgical Operating Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co., also rejected the domestic insurers' argument that equitable estoppel should let them ride along with their foreign co-subscribers' arbitration rights.
Why it matters
Louisiana is one of the few states that flatly bars mandatory arbitration clauses in insurance contracts, and this ruling confirms that a policy blending domestic and foreign capacity splits into two separate dispute-resolution tracks the moment a coverage fight arises. Owners, asset managers, and lenders placing layered or syndicated property insurance with Louisiana exposure should expect to litigate the same coverage dispute simultaneously in court against domestic carriers and in arbitration against foreign carriers.
Read the full write-up and case timeline
The complete analysis of this matter, with its procedural history and practical takeaways.
Open the full matterGet an email when a matter like this is filed
Set up a free watchlist for environmental matters in Louisiana, or for the tenants, borrowers and guarantors in your portfolio.
Create a watchlistMore environmental matters
Other matters in Louisiana
CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.