Ritz-Carlton Development Co. Loses Appeal Over $122M Eagle County Tax Assessment on Bachelor Gulch Timeshares

Full write-up

A Marriott International subsidiary has lost its bid to roll back a roughly $122 million property tax assessment on the fractionally owned condominium units at the Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch, after the Colorado Court of Appeals on November 5, 2026 affirmed Eagle County's valuation of the luxury ski-in, ski-out property. The ruling closes out, for now, a multi-year valuation fight that began when the county roughly doubled its assessment of the resort's 54 condominium units for the 2023 tax year, pushing the figure from about $68.6 million to a sum press accounts have described as between $122 million and $124 million depending on the stage of the dispute being measured.

The property is divided into 648 fractional ownership interests, each entitling its holder to use a unit for 21 days a year, a common structure for ultra-luxury ski and resort properties that lets a developer sell high-end accommodations to buyers who want a seasonal second home without the cost of owning a whole unit outright. Ritz-Carlton Development Co. (RCDC), the Marriott subsidiary that built and operates the fractional program at Bachelor Gulch, challenged the county's valuation methodology, arguing the assessor had effectively priced the 54 physical units as though they were conventional whole-ownership condominiums without accounting for the fractional structure.

At oral argument in October 2026, the Court of Appeals panel pressed both sides on whether the units should be valued as ordinary fee-simple condominiums or whether Colorado's assessment framework required a downward adjustment to reflect that each unit is actually owned by multiple fractional interest-holders rather than a single owner. In its unpublished decision, the panel sided with the county, holding that Colorado property tax law does not recognize a distinct valuation methodology for the fractional-ownership model RCDC employs at Bachelor Gulch, and rejecting a two-step valuation analysis RCDC had urged the court to adopt.

Because the opinion is unpublished, it does not carry binding precedential weight for other fractional-ownership disputes elsewhere in Colorado. But the practical signal for the ski-resort timeshare and private-residence-club sector is clear: assessors are not required, as a matter of law, to discount a property's taxable value simply because it has been carved into fractional interests, and taxpayers hoping to argue otherwise will need a more persuasive doctrinal hook than RCDC offered here. Owners of similar fractional or branded-residence programs in Colorado and other resort jurisdictions should expect assessors to treat this result as support for valuing such properties at or near whole-ownership comparable values, and should budget appraisal and litigation resources accordingly if a reassessment produces a similarly large increase. A valuation fight of this kind, running from the county through the state Board of Assessment Appeals and the Court of Appeals, is a multi-year commitment that owners should factor into refinancing or disposition timelines for comparable assets.

Case timeline