Date
October 15, 2026
Court or forum
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
State
Pennsylvania
Presiding judge
Lori A. Dumas
Amount / scale
Not a monetary claim; developer sought a declaratory judgment voiding stormwater buffer ordinance amendments as unconstitutional and invalid special legislation
Parties
Appellant (Developer/Property Owner): Orchard BJK Company, LLCAppellant (Developer/Property Owner): Pocono Mountains Industries, Inc.Appellee: Coolbaugh Township Board of Supervisors

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on October 15, 2026, affirmed dismissal of a constitutional challenge brought by Orchard BJK Company, LLC and Pocono Mountains Industries, Inc. against Coolbaugh Township's 2023 amendments tripling wetland buffer distances under its stormwater ordinance. The developers sued while their own petition asking the Township's Board to waive the new buffers for a planned warehouse on Lot 2 was still pending before the Board, and the court held the claims were not yet ripe because the Board could still grant the waiver.

Why it matters

The ruling is a reminder to commercial and industrial landowners that courts will treat a constitutional challenge to a zoning or stormwater ordinance as premature when the ordinance itself preserves a waiver or variance mechanism and an application under that mechanism remains pending before the same body being sued. Developers should let a pending administrative waiver request play out, or affirmatively withdraw it, before suing over the underlying rule.

Weekly email

New on CREdocket, every Monday

The week's new commercial real estate lawsuits, rulings in cases we follow, and market signals. Free; unsubscribe in one click.

Orchard BJK Company and Pocono Mountains Industries own a cluster of commercially and industrially zoned parcels in Coolbaugh Township, a Monroe County municipality in Pennsylvania's Pocono Mountains region. In April 2023, the Township's Board of Supervisors approved the companies' application to subdivide one tract into two parcels, a 35.5-acre Lot 1 and a 73.16-acre Lot 2, and conditionally approved a land development plan for Lot 1 calling for an approximately 333,000-square-foot warehouse, built to the stormwater and subdivision ordinances then in effect.

Case timeline · 6 entries Latest: October 15, 2026 — Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirms dismissal as unripe

Free · no account needed

Keep reading

Read the full write-up and case timeline. Up to 10 a month are free without an account; a free account is unlimited and adds email alerts.

Read the full write-up

Or create a free account with just your email:

Alerts

Get an email when new zoning & land use matters in Pennsylvania are filed

Case Value Calculator · Beta

What's this Zoning & Land Use case worth?

Describe your own facts and get a damages-range estimate grounded in real cited case law.

Try the calculator
Share LinkedIn Email

More zoning & land use matters

Other matters in Pennsylvania

Recently added

CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.