Date
October 1, 2026
Added to tracker
October 19, 2026
Court or forum
Appellate Division, First Department, New York
State
New York
Property type
Retail
Amount / scale
Landlord sought approximately $307,577.08 in unpaid rent plus liquidated damages and enforcement costs
Parties
Landlord/Plaintiff-Appellant: 62 Wooster, LLCTenant/Defendant: TML N.Y. Inc.

The Appellate Division, First Department affirmed dismissal of a SoHo landlord's claims against the individual guarantors of a retail lease at 476 Broome Street, holding their liability ended when the tenant physically vacated the premises in 2020 notwithstanding a separate lease provision tying liability to a later, formally defined 'Surrender Date.' The court applied the Court of Appeals' 2025 decision in 1995 CAM LLC v. West Side Advisors, which construed 'surrender' in a guaranty to mean the tenant's physical relinquishment of possession, not a landlord's acceptance or a later contractual milestone. The ruling forecloses the landlord's claims for roughly $307,577.08 in unpaid rent plus liquidated damages and enforcement costs against the guarantors.

Why it matters

Good guy guaranties are a standard risk-mitigation tool in New York City commercial leasing, and this decision confirms courts will resolve internal conflicts in guaranty release language in favor of the simpler, vacatur-based trigger, even where a landlord's drafting attempted to extend liability through a more technical defined term. Landlords relying on multi-layered 'Surrender Date' concepts to keep guarantors on the hook past actual move-out should reconcile that language with any surrender-based release clause before the next lease is signed, not after a tenant has already left.

Weekly email

New on CREdocket, every Monday

The week's new commercial real estate lawsuits, rulings in cases we follow, and market signals. Free; unsubscribe in one click.

The Appellate Division, First Department has affirmed the dismissal of a SoHo landlord's claims against the individual guarantors of a retail lease, holding that their personal liability ended when the tenant physically vacated the premises -- regardless of a separate lease provision that purported to extend liability until a later, formally defined 'Surrender Date.' The October 1, 2026 decision in 62 Wooster, LLC v. TML N.Y. Inc. is among the first significant applications of the New York Court of Appeals' 2025 ruling in 1995 CAM LLC v. West Side Advisors, and it gives landlords and counsel a clearer picture of how good guy guaranty release language will be read when a lease's own provisions conflict.

Case timeline · 3 entries Latest: October 1, 2026 — Appellate Division, First Department affirms dismissal of the landlord's claims against the guarantors

Free · no account needed

Keep reading

Read the full write-up and case timeline. Up to 10 a month are free without an account; a free account is unlimited and adds email alerts.

Read the full write-up

Or create a free account with just your email:

Alerts

Get an email when new commercial lease disputes matters in New York are filed

Case Value Calculator · free beta

Facing a dispute like this one?

Get a damages range for your own facts, with the reasoning and the cases behind it. What is a commercial lease dispute worth?

Estimate your case
Share LinkedIn Email

Looking for something else?

More commercial lease disputes matters

Other matters in New York

Recently added

CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.