Why use a model

Everyone in a dispute overestimates their own case

481 lawyers

predicted the outcomes of their own cases before trial. As a group they were overconfident, and their accuracy did not improve with years of experience.

Goodman-Delahunty, Granhag, Hartwig & Loftus, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (2010) ↗

61.2%

of plaintiffs who turned down a settlement offer and went to trial or arbitration did no better than the defendant's last offer, in 2,054 cases. Defendants paid more than the plaintiff's last demand 24.3% of the time, and their mistakes cost more.

Kiser, Asher & McShane, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (2008) ↗

75%

of claims this calculator rated "favorable" (60–75% likely) were won on liability; claims it rated "weak" won 13% and "strong" 95%. Measured on 178 claims in 33 resolved cases, each checked against the court's opinion.

Every case, hits and misses →

A party's own lawyer has a client to please and a fee riding on the answer. This calculator weighs both sides' facts the same way every time and says how often its ratings come true. Where it is weaker today is how much: winners often recover less than everything they claim, and we publish those misses too while we rebuild the damages measure.

How This Works

This tool is in beta. The underlying probability and damages modeling is still being actively developed and refined as more real case data — settlements, judgments, and consent decrees — is incorporated. Ranges shown today should be treated as an early, evolving estimate, not a finished or stable model.

This is a transparent, explainable framework calibrated against real, cited case outcomes and (where relevant) state law — not a black-box statistical prediction, and not a substitute for judicial or arbitral resolution of an actual dispute. Every probability and damages range shown is grounded in either a specific legal rule or a comparable case cited in the results.

This tool does not provide legal advice and does not predict the outcome of any specific matter. Litigation outcomes depend on facts, evidence, jurisdiction, and counsel that a short questionnaire cannot capture. Discuss an actual matter with counsel →

Read the full calculator methodology → · See it applied to real cases → · How it scores on real outcomes →

See It In Action

What a real result looks like

Sample output — fabricated facts, for illustration only

Illustrative scenario: a retail tenant on a 10-year lease with 3 years remaining stops paying rent and vacates; the landlord sues for the unpaid rent and the accelerated remaining-term rent. None of these facts are real — but the two citations below are: they're drawn from CREdocket's actual, independently-verified case-law database, the same one every real analysis is grounded in.

AI Analysis — Probability-Weighted Prediction — Landlord view
$580,000 – $740,000

Best-guess case value: $655,000

Category: Commercial Lease Disputes Jurisdiction: Texas Your side: Landlord Strong case-law coverage (illustrative count)
Reserve & Settlement Guidance

Even in the worst case here, this analysis nets out to a gain for Landlord — a contingent recovery, not an exposure. Under ASC 450-30, a contingent gain like this is generally not booked as a receivable until it's realized or realization is assured, however likely it looks here.

Settlement Position
Opening ask
$740,000
Your best-case litigated recovery.
Target
$655,000
Economically equivalent to litigating it out.
Walk-away
$580,000
Never accept less than your worst-case litigated recovery.

Not accounting or legal advice — a starting framework for your own auditors and counsel, derived from the probability-weighted estimate above.

Claim-by-Claim Detail

Unpaid Rent

90–97% likelihood
Damages range: $95,000 – $95,000
Expected value: $88,000 – $92,000

Undisputed accrued rent on a written lease is close to open-and-shut absent a real defense to the underlying debt.

Grounded in real cases:

Accelerated Rent

65–90% likelihood
Damages range: $540,000 – $702,000
Expected value: $470,000 – $610,000

Lease has an acceleration clause; damages reflect the remaining 3-year term rent, offset by the landlord's duty to mitigate through re-letting.

Grounded in real cases:
Cummings Properties, LLC v. Hines (2023) — $68,650 high confidence

This is a probability-weighted prediction generated from the documents provided, not a legal opinion, adjudication, or substitute for counsel — see the full disclaimer below the tool.

Generates a real PDF using the exact same report code every paid analysis produces — so you can see the actual deliverable, not just a description of it.

Tested on real cases

How it did on cases whose outcome is known

We ran the live calculator on real commercial real estate cases from published appellate opinions, giving it only the opinion's facts and each side's contentions with every statement of the award or holding removed, then compared its range with the final result after any appeal. Its range contained the final outcome in 17 of 32 scored cases (v4.3). Three recent examples:

  • 5th and Walnut Parking LLC v. City of Des Moines

    Iowa Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2026 · analyzed for the property owner / developer
    Calculator range: $0 – $20.92M Final outcome: $4.35M Within the range

    Read the decision ↗

  • Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. v. BlueRoad Fontanel, LLC

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville · Apr 1, 2026 · analyzed for the property owner
    Calculator range: $12.16M – $23.29M Final outcome: $13.9M Within the range

    Read the decision ↗

  • CLE Venture Fund, L.P. v. Coventry Partners, L.L.C.

    Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth Appellate District · Jul 10, 2025 · analyzed for the lender
    Calculator range: $-812,000 – $2.45M Final outcome: $1.74M Within the range

    Read the decision ↗

Every case, hits and misses →

What is a dispute like yours worth? Commercial lease dispute · Commercial loan, foreclosure or guaranty claim · Commercial construction defect claim · Commercial condemnation claim · Zoning or land-use claim · Premises liability claim against a commercial property · REIT securities or fiduciary claim · Commercial property contamination claim

Estimate a Matter

Describe your case, upload your documents, or both

Cost to Litigate & Settlement Comparison

These cost/timeline figures are general commercial-litigation industry norms, not individually cited to a specific real case the way the estimate above is — enter your own numbers below if you have them.

Enter this the same way as your own net position above: a positive number if this is money you'd receive (or a cost you'd avoid) by settling, negative if it's money you'd pay.

Lease Mitigation Reference (Landlord-Tenant Only)

If this is a landlord-tenant matter involving accelerated/future rent, a landlord generally has a duty to mitigate by re-leasing the space. Enter your own broker's re-lease estimate below if you have one — it replaces this tool's generic mitigation assumption with your actual number. Leave blank (and this section is ignored) for any other kind of matter.