Date
October 22, 2026
Court or forum
Ohio Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate District
State
Ohio
Presiding judge
Eileen T. Gallagher
Property type
Mixed-Use
Amount / scale
Right of first refusal over a parcel within the Crocker Park development (no dollar figure stated in the opinion)
Parties
Plaintiff-Appellee: Crocker Park, L.L.C.Third-Party Defendant-Appellee: Crocker Park Management, L.L.C.Defendant-Appellant: City of Westlake, Ohio

The Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eighth Appellate District vacated its own July 30, 2026 decision on reconsideration and held, in an opinion released October 22, 2026, that the trial court erred in declaring Crocker Park, L.L.C. had not waived its right of first refusal over a parcel within the Crocker Park mixed-use development. The court affirmed other rulings in Crocker Park's favor -- including summary judgment defeating the City of Westlake's slander-of-title and abuse-of-process counterclaims -- but reversed and remanded the right-of-first-refusal issue after finding Crocker Park failed to exercise the right within a reasonable time.

Why it matters

The case shows that master-planned developments governed by recorded CC&R declarations create full contractual rights and obligations for a municipality that becomes a co-owner by accepting conveyed parcels, and that rights of first refusal without an express deadline can still be waived through delay. It is also a pointed reminder that an appellate win is not final until the reconsideration window closes, since the panel here vacated its own three-month-old decision and reversed a key ruling the second time around.

Weekly email

New on CREdocket, every Monday

The week's new commercial real estate lawsuits, rulings in cases we follow, and market signals. Free; unsubscribe in one click.

The Ohio Court of Appeals for the Eighth Appellate District has taken the unusual step of vacating its own, three-month-old decision and issuing a new one that hands the City of Westlake a win it did not get the first time around. In Crocker Park, L.L.C. v. City of Westlake, Ohio, the court held on reconsideration that the trial court erred when it declared Crocker Park had not waived its right of first refusal over a parcel within the Crocker Park development, reversing that portion of the judgment and sending the issue back to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, even as it left most of the rest of the trial court's rulings intact.

Case timeline · 5 entries Latest: October 22, 2026 — On reconsideration, the Eighth District vacates its July decision and holds the trial court erred in finding Crocker Park had not waived its right of first refusal

Free · no account needed

Keep reading

Read the full write-up and case timeline. Up to 10 a month are free without an account; a free account is unlimited and adds email alerts.

Read the full write-up

Or create a free account with just your email:

Alerts

Get an email when new commercial lease disputes matters in Ohio are filed

Case Value Calculator · free beta

Facing a dispute like this one?

Get a damages range for your own facts, with the reasoning and the cases behind it. What is a commercial lease dispute worth?

Estimate your case
Share LinkedIn Email

Looking for something else?

More commercial lease disputes matters

Other matters in Ohio

Recently added

CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.