Date
October 19, 2026
Added to tracker
October 23, 2026
Court or forum
California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two
State
California
Presiding judge
Chad A. Stegeman
Property type
Office
Amount / scale
$1,219,015.63 future-rent award (plus $350,677.82 back rent and holdover)
Parties
Plaintiff/Respondent (Landlord): USPA City Center, LLCDefendant/Appellant (Tenant): Law Offices of Jason W. Estavillo, P.C.

A California appeals court published its ruling upholding $1,219,015.63 in future rent for the landlord of 555 12th Street in Oakland against a defaulted law-firm office tenant.

On October 19, 2026, the California Court of Appeal ordered its September 21 opinion in USPA City Center, LLC v. Law Offices of Jason W. Estavillo, P.C. published, which makes it binding precedent. The opinion affirmed an Alameda County judgment giving the landlord of 555 12th Street in downtown Oakland $350,677.82 in back rent and holdover damages and $1,219,015.63 in future rent, discounted to present value, against a law-firm tenant that defaulted months into a 66-month office lease. The court rejected the tenant's arguments that the future-rent award lacked evidence, was a penalty, and paid the landlord twice.

Why it matters

There is now published California authority that a landlord can recover several years of future rent under Civil Code section 1951.2 when it proves, through broker testimony and vacancy data, that the space cannot realistically be re-let. The record describes the downtown Oakland office market as weak, which gives landlords in similar markets a model for proving rental losses the tenant could not have avoided. The court also held that a stipulated judgment for future rent is not a penalty when it only restates what the lease and the Civil Code already allow.

Weekly email

New on CREdocket, every Monday

The week's new commercial real estate lawsuits, rulings in cases we follow, and market signals. Free; unsubscribe in one click.

In December 2023, the Law Offices of Jason W. Estavillo, P.C. signed a 66-month lease for 7,755 square feet in Suite 1280 at 555 12th Street in downtown Oakland, owned by USPA City Center, LLC. Rent started at $30,333.33 a month and went up each March. According to the opinion, the tenant's security-deposit check bounced, and by June 2024 it owed $107,618 in unpaid rent. The landlord filed an unlawful detainer action that month. The parties settled: the tenant would pay an extra $15,000 a month on top of rent, and if it failed, the landlord could have judgment entered for possession, unpaid rent, fees and future rent through the end of the lease.

Case timeline · 6 entries Latest: October 19, 2026 — Opinion certified for publication

Free · no account needed

Keep reading

Read the full write-up and case timeline. Up to 10 a month are free without an account; a free account is unlimited and adds email alerts.

Read the full write-up

Or create a free account with just your email:

Alerts

Get an email when new commercial lease disputes matters in California are filed

Case Value Calculator · free beta

Facing a dispute like this one?

Get a damages range for your own facts, with the reasoning and the cases behind it. What is a commercial lease dispute worth?

Estimate your case
Share LinkedIn Email

Looking for something else?

More commercial lease disputes matters

Other matters in California

Recently added

CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.