Date
October 16, 2026
Court or forum
Supreme Court of Alabama
State
Alabama
Presiding judge
Will Sellers
Amount / scale
$65,827.50 unpaid-rent judgment affirmed; tenant also held to owe landlord defense and indemnity on separate personal-injury claims
Parties
Landlord: Commercial Properties, Inc.Tenant: Montgomery Civic Ballet, Inc., d/b/a Montgomery Ballet Studios

The Alabama Supreme Court on October 16, 2026, affirmed a trial court's order striking as untimely a commercial tenant's opposition to its landlord's motion for partial summary judgment, leaving intact a $65,827.50 unpaid-rent judgment and a ruling that the tenant, Montgomery Civic Ballet, Inc., owes its landlord, Commercial Properties, Inc., defense and indemnity on mold-related personal-injury claims arising from the same shopping-center lease. On the landlord's cross-appeal, the Court reversed in part and remanded, holding the trial court could not simultaneously certify the partial judgment as final under Rule 54(b) while also purporting to dismiss the entire case.

Why it matters

The ruling is a reminder to commercial landlords and tenants that Alabama's summary-judgment response deadlines are measured in business days and enforced strictly, and that a tenant who vacates over a maintenance dispute risks losing the chance to contest a resulting rent judgment and indemnity obligation on the merits if its own filings also miss the window. It also shows that a Rule 54(b) finality certification cannot coexist with an order that simultaneously purports to dismiss the whole case.

Weekly email

New on CREdocket, every Monday

The week's new commercial real estate lawsuits, rulings in cases we follow, and market signals. Free; unsubscribe in one click.

The Supreme Court of Alabama on October 16, 2026, affirmed a trial court's decision to strike as untimely a commercial tenant's opposition to its landlord's motion for partial summary judgment, leaving in place a $65,827.50 unpaid-rent judgment and a ruling that the tenant owes its landlord defense and indemnity on personal-injury claims arising from the same leased premises. In a companion cross-appeal, the Court also held that the trial court could not simultaneously certify the partial judgment as final under Rule 54(b) and purport to dismiss the entire case outright, reversing that portion of the order and remanding for further proceedings.

Case timeline · 5 entries Latest: October 16, 2026 — Alabama Supreme Court affirms the untimeliness ruling, but reverses in part and remands on the Rule 54(b) certification-and-dismissal order

Free · no account needed

Keep reading

Read the full write-up and case timeline. Up to 10 a month are free without an account; a free account is unlimited and adds email alerts.

Read the full write-up

Or create a free account with just your email:

Alerts

Get an email when new commercial lease disputes matters in Alabama are filed

Case Value Calculator · Beta

What's this Commercial Lease Disputes case worth?

Describe your own facts and get a damages-range estimate grounded in real cited case law.

Try the calculator
Share LinkedIn Email

More commercial lease disputes matters

Other matters in Alabama

Recently added

CREdocket summarizes public court records and reporting; see our sourcing standards and corrections log. Not legal advice. Facing something similar? Contact us.